Now that these tools are more widely available, teachers need to educate students and the public about what makes these different from other student-friendly technology, such as a grammar check or even a calculator. That was published in September 2021, and in little more than a year, more powerful AI language models have emerged, including ChatGPT. Reich, Sahami, and Weinstein used it to write a small part of their book System Error: Where Big Tech Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot. Why This Technology is DifferentĪn AI writing program called GPT-3 has made headlines and sometimes produces writing that is almost indistinguishable from human writing. Age restrictions and age-verification systems could also limit the potential for student misuse. For example, one method would be to have all text generated by commercial AI language moderators placed in an independent repository so papers could be checked for plagiarism. In a recent op-ed in The Guardian, Reich, Sahami, and Weinstein put forth several potential ways that tech companies could safeguard against the misuse of AI writing models. However, Reich, Sahami, and Weinstein believe this places the emphasis on teachers when the tech companies that create and release this technology should do more to safeguard against its misuse. Or teachers might structure assignments in the form of a dialogue, forcing each student to respond to inputs from another student. For instance, a student could be required to show an outline and other work documenting how an assignment progressed. Teachers can also structure assignments in such a way that the AI writing models can’t mimic currently. But of course, we don't ourselves have the ability to detect the use of these tools.” “ will be met by the same kinds of standards with respect to the honor code at Stanford as any other form of plagiarism. “We feel that we need to add language in the syllabus that signals for our students our expectations about them not using these tools, to either write code for the technical assignment, or to draft their philosophy papers or policy memos,” Weinstein says. However, teachers can still discuss the technology with their students and explain that using AI writing tools is a serious form of cheating.įor the first time, Reich, Sahami, and Weinstein are addressing the potential misuse of the technology with students for the course they teach together, Ethics of Technological Disruption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |